Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 9:38 pm Post subject: ISLAM HAS INSTITUALINIZED RACIST SEE DETAILS
ISLAM HAS INSTITUTIONALIZED RACISM AND HATE IN THE QURAN; WHEREAS, THE BIBLE HAS INSTITUTIONALIZED LOVE OF GOD AND NEIGHBOR IN THE BIBLE.
THE BIBLE AT 1 JOHN 4:8, [AUTHORIZED KING JAMES BIBLE; AV] CLEARLY STATES, “He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.” CLEARLY SHOWING THAT THE TRUE GOD’S CHIEF ATTRIBUTE IS LOVE, AND THAT LOVE OF NEIGHBOR IS REQUIRED OF ALL GENUINE BELIEVERS. THIS IS STATED MANY TIMES IN THE BIBLE, AND HERE ARE A FEW OF THOSE PLACES IN THE [AV]:
Le 19:18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD.
Mt 5:43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
Mt 19:19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Mt 22:39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Mr 12:31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
Lu 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
Ro 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
NOW LET’S LOOK AT REALITY WITH RESPECT WHAT MUSLIM APOLOGIST/PROPAGANDIST AND THE QURAN SAY:
MUSLIM PROPAGANDIST SUCH AS IFTIKHAR, A WELL KNOWN MUSLIM APOLOGIST, DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT AND PERVERT THE TRUTH.
FIRST, WITH RESPECT LANGUAGE, THERE IS NOTHING SACRED ABOUT LANGUAGES, THEY ARE BUT A MEANS OF COMMUNICATING BETWEEN HUMAN BEINGS, AND NOTHING MORE. ILL INFORMED MUSLIM PROPAGANDIST TRY AND MAKE MUCH MORE OUT OF IT AND SAY NONSENSE THINGS SUCH AS:
(QUOTE) “ English language is not only a lingua franca but also lingua frankensteinia” (QUOTE)
THIS IS UTTER NONSENSE AS ENGLISH IS THE LINGUA FRANCA OF THIS CENTURY AS IT IS UNDERSTOOD IN MORE PLACES THAN ANY OTHER. EVERY ERA HAS A LINGUA FRANCA; FOR EXAMPLE IN THE FIRST CENTURY IT WAS GREEK, THEN IT WAS LATIN, AND NOW IT IS ENGLISH. THE LINGUA FRANCA OF ANY AGE IS NOT A LINGUA FRANKENSTEINIA AS SOME MUSLIM PROPAGANDIST FALSELY AND WITH MALICE A FORETHOUGHT CLAIM.
SECOND, THERE ARE PEOPLE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM WITH OVER 50 (FIFTY) DIFFERENT LANGUAGES AND THESE SHOULD BE TAUGHT AT HOME UNTIL THE COLLEGE YEARS AS THEY ALL COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE TAUGHT IN THE LOWER GRADES OF SCHOOLS AND ALL SHOULD BE COGNIZANT OF THIS FACT. ALSO, AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, ALMOST ALL IMPORTANT WORKS, BOOKS, IN OTHER LANGUAGES HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH, WHICH IS ONE OF THE MOST COMPLETE LANGUAGES IN EXISTENCE. OTHER LANGUAGES SUCH AS URDU DO NOT HAVE WORDS TO EXPRESS MANY THINGS WHICH CAN BE EXPRESSED IN ONE WORD IN ENGLISH, AND NOT REQUIRE AN ENTIRE SENTENCE. YES, IT IS GOOD TO BE MULTILINGUAL AS I AM, BUT OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE IS BEING HIGHLY COMPETENT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE COUNTRY YOU LIVE IN.
THIS SAME PROPAGANDIST WENT ON TO SAY THE FOLLOWING NONSENSE AND ERROR:
(QUOTE) “English is today the world killer language. Linguistic genocide is a crime against humanity and British schooling is guilty of committing this crime.” (QUOTE)
IF ONE DOES NOT HATES THE LANGUAGE OF THE COUNTRY HE/SHE IS IMMIGRATING TO THEY SHOULD DO EVERYONE A FAVOR AND NOT GO THERE, BUT IN NO CASE COMPLAIN ABOUT THE HOST COUNTRY LANGUAGE – THIS IS JUST PLAIN DUMB.
HE GOES ON TO SAY:
(QUOTE) “Majority of Muslim children in British schools are from Pakistan, Bangladesh and India They need to learn Arabic and Urdu to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry.” (QUOTE)
NOW IF THIS BE SO, THEN THEIR PARENTS SHOULD NOT BE NEGLIGENT PARENTS, BUT TEACH THEM INSTEAD OF TRYING TO THROW PARENTAL DUTIES ON THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. I LEARNED MY PARENT’S LANGUAGE FROM THEM, BUT MY HOST COUNTRIE’S LANGUAGE IN THE GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS, AND THIS IS HOW IT SHOULD BE.
THIRD, IFTIKHAR AND OTHER MUSLIM APOLOGIST TRY TO MAKE IT LIKE OTHERS ARE GUILTY WITH RESPECT TO THEIR OWN WRONG DOINGS AND PRACTICES. TAKE WHAT HE SAYS WITH REGARD TO INSTITUTIONAL RACISM:
(QUOTE) “British schooling is the home of institutional racism and native teachers are chicken racists. “ (QUOTE)
YET WITH RESPECT INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, ISLAM IS THE VERY WORST OFFENDER IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. NOW LET’S LOOK AT THE DEFINITION OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM AND HOW EVEN ISLAM’S QURAN IS THE STRONGEST PROMOTER OF IT.
INSTITUTIONAL RACISM IS A PATTERN OF SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS — SUCH AS GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS, SCHOOLS, BANKS, AND COURTS OF LAW — GIVING NEGATIVE TREATMENT TO A GROUP OF PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR RACE. INSTITUTIONAL RACISM LEADS TO INEQUALITY; SOCIOLOGISTS USE THE CONCEPT TO EXPLAIN WHY SOME PEOPLE FACE UNEQUAL TREATMENT OR OCCUPY UNEQUAL STATUSES. ONE HISTORIC EXAMPLE OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM IS THE BARRING OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN STUDENTS FROM ATTENDING CERTAIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, WHICH LIMITED THE STUDENTS' EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND HELPED PREVENT THEM FROM ACHIEVING A STATUS EQUAL TO THAT OF OTHERS. INSTITUTIONAL RACISM NEED NOT INVOLVE INTENTIONAL RACIAL DISCRIMINATION. [SOURC - RETRIEVED FROM HTTP://WWW.CHEGG.COM/HOMEWORK-HELP/DEFINITIONS/INSTITUTIONAL-RACISM-49 ON 11/13/2016]
NOW HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF A RELIGION ACTUALLY INSTITUTING INSTITUTIONAL RACISM IN THEIR SO CALLED HOLY BOOK:
QUR’AN SURA 9:29—FIGHT THOSE WHO BELIEVE NOT IN ALLAH NOR THE LAST DAY, NOR HOLD THAT FORBIDDEN WHICH HATH BEEN FORBIDDEN BY ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER, NOR ACKNOWLEDGE THE RELIGION OF TRUTH, FROM AMONG THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK, UNTIL THEY PAY THE JIZYAH WITH WILLING SUBMISSION, AND FEEL THEMSELVES SUBDUED.
QUR’AN SURA 9:30—THE JEWS CALL UZAIR A SON OF GOD, AND THE CHRISTIANS CALL CHRIST THE SON OF GOD. THAT IS A SAYING FROM THEIR MOUTH; (IN THIS) THEY BUT IMITATE WHAT THE UNBELIEVERS OF OLD USED TO SAY. ALLAH’S CURSE BE ON THEM: HOW THEY ARE DELUDED AWAY FROM THE TRUTH!
NOW WHAT BETTER ILLUSTRATION CAN ONE FIND OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM; YET, TO THIS DAY, MUSLIMS STILL BELIEVE IN THIS INSTITUTIONAL RACISM AND REFUSE TO REMOVE IT FROM THEIR QURAN. AND MANY MUSLIM GROUPS STILL REQUIRE THE ‘JIZYAH’ FROM BELIEVERS IN OTHER RELIGIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, ISIS A MUSLIM GROUP, LEVELED IT ON RESIDENTS OF AREAS UNDER THEIR CONTROL AS DO SOME IN SOMALIA AND YEMEN. IN ADDITION, ISLAM HAS FAILED TO RETURN ANY OF THE ‘JIZYAH’ PAID TO THEM IN THE PAST WHICH SHOWS THEY STILL BELIEVE IN INSTITUTIONAL RACISM AGAINST OTHERS.
FURTHER PROOF OF THIS IS IFTIKHAR AHMAD, A MUSLIM PROPAGANDIST IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (UK) HAS STATED MANY TIMES THAT THERE IS NO PLACE IN A MUSLIM SCHOOL FOR NON-MUSLIMS; WHEREAS, SCHOOLS RUN BY OTHER RELIGIONS, CATHOLIC, CHURCH OF ENGLAND, QUAKER, ETC. READILY ACCEPT CHILDREN OF OTHER RELIGIONS. HE EVEN WENT MUCH FURTHER AND STATED A STANDARD STATE SCHOOL WITH OVER 50 PERCENT MUSLIM CHILDREN IN IT SHOULD BE DECLARED A MUSLIM ACADEMY IN HIS OPINION. YET, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, HE ACTUALLY ACCUSED THE UK GOVERNMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM.
YES, THE QURAN HAS MANY MORE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS THE FOLLOWING:
Qur’an Sura 9:28—O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
Qur’an Sura 9:29—Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Qur’an Sura 9:30—The Jews call Uzair a son of God, and the Christians call Christ the son of God. That is a saying from their mouth; (In this) they but imitate what the Unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
Qur’an Sura 9:31—They take their priests and their anchorites to be their lords in derogation of Allah, and (they take as their Lord) Christ, the son of Mary; yet they were commanded to worship but One God: there is no god but He. Praise and glory to Him: (Far is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him).
Qur’an Sura 9:32—Fain would they extinguish Allah’s Light with their mouths, but Allah will not allow but that His Light should be perfected, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it).
Qur’an Sura 9:33—It is He Who hath sent His Messenger with Guidance and the Religion of Truth, to prevail it over all religion, even though the Pagans may detest (it).
Qur’an Sura 5:51—O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other.
Qur’an Sura 9:73—O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them.
Qur’an Sura 9:111—Surely Allah has bought of the believers their persons and their property for this, that they shall have the garden; they fight in Allah's way, so they slay and are slain.
Qur’an Sura 9:123—O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.
Qur’an Sura 47:35—Be not weary and fainthearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost.
Qur’an Sura 48:29—Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.
QUR’AN Sura 9:111—SURELY ALLAH HAS BOUGHT OF THE BELIEVERS THEIR PERSONS AND THEIR PROPERTY FOR THIS, THAT THEY SHALL HAVE THE GARDEN; THEY FIGHT IN ALLAH'S WAY, SO THEY SLAY AND ARE SLAIN.
QUR’AN Sura 9:123—O YOU WHO BELIEVE! FIGHT THOSE OF THE UNBELIEVERS WHO ARE NEAR TO YOU AND LET THEM FIND IN YOU HARDNESS.
QUR’AN Sura 47:35—BE NOT WEARY AND FAINTHEARTED, CRYING FOR PEACE, WHEN YE SHOULD BE UPPERMOST.
SEE APPENDIX ON HADITHS:
QUR’AN SURA48:29—MUHAMMAD IS THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH, AND THOSE WHO ARE WITH HIM ARE SEVERE AGAINST DISBELIEVERS, AND MERCIFUL AMONG THEMSELVES.
HIS FALSE ACCUSATION AGAINST THE UK IS REALLY LAUGHABLE AS THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANYTHING REMOTELY APPROACHING INSTITUTIONAL RACISM IN THAT KINGDOM SINCE THE REIGN OF KING HENRY VIII IN THE 15 CENTURY. OBVIOUSLY HE HAS A PHOBIA AND IS SEEING NON-EXISTENT THINGS. HE SHOULD NOT CONSTANTLY BE TRYING TO RUN DOWN HIS GRACIOUS HOST COUNTRY AND ITS NATIVES. HE EVEN USES THE CRIMINAL AND SMALL UNDESIRABLE ELEMENT IN THE COUNTRY HE IMMIGRATED TO AS THE SUM AND TOTAL OF THAT COUNTRY SO AS TO HAVE AN IMAGINARY REASON TO REMAIN AN ISOLATIONIST AND NOT ASSIMILATE. HE SHOULD STOP BEING SO NEGATIVE AND JOIN THE MULTI-CULTURAL CULTURE OF THE UK.
AS CAN READILY BE SEEN ISLAM, NOT THE UNITED KINGDOM IS THE WORLDS WORST PRACTICER OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, BUT THEY DO NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH UGLY REALITY.
AS I HAVE TOLD THIS MUSLIM APOLOGIST IN THE PAST:
YOU NEED TO WAKE UP. THOSE SCHOOLS SHOULD NOT EVEN EXIST, APPARENTLY YOU HAVE FAILED EITHER TO READ AND/OR COMPREHEND MY REPLY TO YOU YESTERDAY. ANY SCHOOL THAT ONLY ADMITS STUDENTS OF ONE NATIONALITY OR RELIGION IS DISCRIMINATORY AND RACIST AND SHOULD NOT EVEN BE PERMITTED TO EXIST. NOW THAT TRUTH IS KNOWN, WHY SHOULD ONE NOT, I REPEAT, NOT CRITICIZE A DISCRIMINATORY AND RACIST SCHOOL?
NOW LET’S REVERT TO REALITIES I POSTED TO YOU YESTERDAY THAT YOU SHOULD RE-READ AND COMPREHEND INSTEAD OF MAKING MORE HOGwash DUMB RANTS.
FIRST, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. YOU CLAIM TO BE
IN EDUCATION FOR 40 YEARS, YET YOU DO NOT KNOW MOST LEARN RACISM AND
HATE IN THEIR FORMATIVE YEARS BEFORE THEY EVEN GO TO SCHOOL. IF
PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN ARE EXPOSED TO HATING OTHERS, A LOVE OF VIOLENCE,
AND A DISREGARD FOR THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF OTHERS IN THEIR
FORMATIVE YEARS BEFORE SCHOOL, MANY WILL RETAIN THIS REGARDLESS OF
LATER SCHOOLING. YOU EVEN SAID THE FOLLOWING NONSENSE HOGwash:
(QUOTE) “All British 7/7 extremists and Jihadist in Iraq and Syria
are the product of British schooling. None of them were ever educated
in a Muslim school. Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools
with Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental
periods, otherwise,” (QUOTE)
THIS IS NOT TRUE AS MANY OF THEM WERE EDUCATED IN MUSLIM SCHOOLS IN
OTHER COUNTRIES AND ALL WHO LIVED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (uk) WENT TO
MOSQUES THERE AND RECEIVED FURTHER EDUCATION.
THE EXPRESS A NEWSPAPER IN THE UK SAID:
(QUOTE) “British imam who recruited murderous teens to radical Islam
asks 'why wasn't I arrested?'
THE "GODFATHER" of Western jihadism who invented the indoctrination
techniques now used by Islamic State to lure young Brits to the Middle
East has admitted he is stunned he has never been arrested for his
crimes.
By NICK GUTTERIDGE
PUBLISHED: 11:38, Mon, Jun 15, 2015 | UPDATED: 11:54, Mon, Jun 15, 2015ITV
Abu Muntasir admits he does not know why he has not been arrested
Reformed radical preacher Abu Muntasir acted as a recruiter for Muslim
extremists for nearly two decades, plucking disaffected youngsters off
the streets of Britain and turning them to the jihadist cause.
In a startlingly frank admission, he has now admitted: "I inspired and
recruited, I raised funds and bought weapons, not just a one-off but
for 15 to 20 years. Why I have never been arrested I don't know."
Muntasir's work developing new recruiting techniques in the West was
so important he came to be known as the "Godfather" of the British
jihadi movement.
He is attributed with grooming "thousands" of disaffected young Muslim
men, and readily admits he "opened the door and the trickle turned to
a flood".
The repentant cleric, who has since turned his back on extremism and
violence, also said it is wrong to make excuses for those going to
fight in the Middle East.
More than 700 Britons have now travelled to fight for Islamic State
Why I have never been arrested I don't know
Abu Muntasir
In a tearful interview, he said: "If I've done those things which have
terribly upset people or hurt people I should be forgiven, I should
forgive others as well.
"I cannot hate, hate is not what Muhammad taught. I have been
forgiven, I will forgive, that's the least I can do. [[JUST HYPOCRISY
AS SHOWN BY HIS ACTIONS.]]
"You have the right to punish me if you think that's fair I will take all that.
"If people want to call me a coward, fine. I'm a coward."
The 55-year-old, who now lives in Suffolk, used his own experience of
fighting for the jihadi cause in Afghanistan and Burma to spread
radical Islam during the 1980s and 1990s.
He also organized arms shipments to extremist fighters and set up
sermons at British mosques where renowned hate preachers indoctrinated
disaffected Muslims.
Speaking today, he said: "There is grooming, no doubt - I know how we
used to convince people by ignoring a lot of facts on the ground,
ignoring reality and alternative views amongst Muslims and Muslim
teaching.
"So the parents need to have more communication with their children,
they need to have more of an overseeing aspect of how to be a good
parent.
Reacting to the news that a 17-year-old is believed to have become
Britain's youngest ever suicide bomber, he added: "It's totally
despicable what he has done, it is an abhorrent crime, and we should
be very careful."
Teenager Talha Asmal, from West Yorkshire, is thought to have
detonated a vehicle packed with explosives while fighting for Islamic
State in Iraq.
His distraught parents say the radicals who sent him to his death
preyed on his "innocence and vulnerability".
British teenagers Kadiza Sultana, Shamima Begum and Amira Abase fled
their homes to join IS
Muntasir made the startling admissions in an upcoming episode of the
ITV documentary series Exposure titled Jihad: A British Story.
His comments came as a number of moderate Muslims warned that Islamic
State is becoming so good at grooming young Britons it is like a
"corporate entity". [[ALSO MANY MUSLIMS IN UK GROOM GIRLS FOR SEXUAL
ACTIVITY AND AS PROSTITUTES]]
The typical age for Britons joining jihad has fallen by ten years
during the Afghanistan War, to between 14 and 26 years old now.
For the first time, significant numbers of Muslim women and young
girls in the West are joining the conflict too.
This has largely been driven by the extremists' effective use of the
internet and social media to appeal to large numbers of young,
disaffected Muslims in the West.
Islamic State has a crack team of online propagandists based at a
nerve centre in its de facto capital Raqqa, who spend all hours of the
day and night promoting the group's vile ideology on the internet.
Haras Rafiq, managing director of counter-extremism think-tank the
Quilliam Foundation, said Islamic State are selling jihad as a fun
"gap year" experience to naive Westerners.
He said: "Youngsters are looking for solutions to problems and
grievances they may have.
"These grievances may be either real and genuine, perceived or
partial. [[DUE TO EARLY PRE-SCHOOL TRAINING]]
SEE PART 3
PART 3
"It could be anything - that they are bored, that they are looking for
adventure or suffering from racism.
"In the case of women it could be that they are suffering from
cultural regressiveness.
"What happens is that they are driven to charismatic recruiters either
offline or online and then they find a solution to their problems
which has a theological justification under it.
He added: "Isis is almost like a corporate entity, this is 21st
century jihad and getting their message out to people is very
important to them."
Qari Asim, imam at the Makkah Mosque in Leeds, said that young people
were being drawn to extremism by a "deluded gang of criminals" who
billed it as a "utopian dream".
He added: "The perpetrators are pretty much acting like paedophiles,
they groom these young individuals over time - radicalisation isn't an
overnight process.
"They prey on these vulnerable young people and brainwash them, and
religion is a unique passion so they tend to use religion to brainwash
these young individuals for their own political aims and gains.
"Mosques, imams, have been very clear and vocal on such issues - that
suicide bombing is not allowed in Islam. Suicide bombing is unlawful
in Islam because it results in one taking his own life, and also
bringing terror and harm on others." [[ALL MOST ALL SUICIDE BOMBERS
TODAY ARE MUSLIM, I COULD ONLY FIND ONE CASE OF A JEW BEING A SUICIDE
BOMBER AND THAT WAS WAY BACK IN THE 1940S]]
It is thought that around 700 young Brits are currently in the Middle
East fighting for Islamic State. [[BEING MURDERS AND/OR ACCESSORY TO
MURDER]]
Alyas Karmani, a former follower of Muntasir's, said the group is
using the same psychology to groom youngsters that his boss once used.
Karmani, who is now a peace campaigner in Bradford, said: "It's not
about ideals - 90 per cent of them never subscribe to the ideals –
it's other factors that are a draw.
"This is the new rock and roll - jihad is sexy. The kid who was not
very good-looking now looks good holding a gun.
"He can get a bride now, he's powerful. The Isis gun is as much a
penis extension as the stockbroker with his Ferrari."
Exposure: Jihad - A British Story will be on ITV at 10.40pm tonight.
[SOURCE - RETRIEVED FROM
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/584557/British-imam-Abu-Muntasir-recruited-UK-teens-radical-Islam-asks-why-wasn-t-I-arrested
ON 11/09/2016]
SO START TELLING THE REALITY, INSTEAD OF PROPAGANDA LIES AND CRAP.
SECOND, HE SPEAKS OF THE WESTERN JUNGLE, BUT FAILS TO SPEAK OF THE
ISLAMIC JUNGLE WHICH IS FAR FAR WORSE. TO SEE THE PROOF OF THIS,
JUST LOOK AT THE MUSLIM MIDDLE EAST AND PAKISTAN AND THE CONDITIONS
AND VIOLENCE THAT IS EPIDEMIC THERE. HE SAID THE FOLLOWING:
(QUOTE) “ they would be lost in western jungle. Muslim children must
develop their cultural, spiritual and linguistic identities before
they are exposed to wider society. The first wave of Muslim immigrants
was not involved in extremism. But their children who were
mis-educated and de-educated by British schooling, were turned to
extremism because British schooling is the home of institutional
racism. It is a crime against humanity to send Muslim children to
state schools with non-Muslim teachers. There is no place for a
non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. “ (QUOTE)
PURE HOGwash AS HINDU, ZOROASTRIAN, SIKH, JEAN, BUDDHIST, IBS, ETC.
CHILDREN GET THE EXACT SAME SCHOOLING IN STANDARD NONE RACIST UK
SCHOOLS, AND NONE OF THEM BECOME EXTREMIST OR RADICALIZED. THIS
FACT ALONE SHOWS THE UK GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS PLAY NO PART IN MUSLIMS
GOING ASTRAY.
THIRD, HE SAID:
(QUOTE) “You better teach your children in your own schools and let
migrant communities teach their children according to their needs and
demands. British Establishment and society should concentrate on the
evils of their own society and stop trying to change the way of life
of Muslims.” (QUOTE)
LET’S US LOOK AT REALITY:
RACIST, DISCRIMINATORY, DIVISIVE, MUSLIM SCHOOLS ONLY FOR MUSLIMS
SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED, IT IS NOTHING SHORT OF RACISM. WHY?
RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS RUN BY CATHOLICS AND OTHER RELIGIONS ARE OPEN TO ALL
IN BRITIAN, NO RELIGIOUS SCHOOL SHOULD RESTRICT STUDENTS BASED ON
RELIGION AS NAZI SCHOOLS DID PRIOR TO THE ENDING OF WW2. ALSO, LET’S
FACE IT, ONLY MUSLIMS BECOME RADICALIZED AND NO ONE ELSE CLEARLY
SHOWING THE PROBLEM IS THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY, NOT STANDARD SECULAR
GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS.
ONLY REASON FOR RESTRICTING WHAT RELIGION STUDENTS ARE ALLOWED IN A
SCHOOL IS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO HIDE THEIR ANTI-SOCIAL AGENDA AS DID
THE NAZIS. WE ALL KNOW HOW BAD THE OUTCOME WAS FROM THAT.
I HAVE MANY FRIENDS WHO ATTENDED CATHOLIC AND QUAKER SCHOOLS YET WERE
NOT OF THOSE RELIGIONS, AND GOT AN EXCELLENT SECULAR EDUCATION, BUT
THESE SCHOOLS WERE NOT PROMOTING A FIFTH COLUMN AGENDA. IT IS EASY
TO SEE MUSLIMS ARE SINCE THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES ENGAGING IN BEHEADINGS
OF BRITISH SOLDIERS, SUBWAY AND BUS BOMBINGS, HONOUR KILLINGS, AND
OTHER NEFEROUS ACTS. ALSO, THEY ARE THE ONLY RELIGION THAT IS
DEMANDING STATE FUNDED MUSLIM FAITH BASED SCHOOLS STRICTLY FOR MUSLIMS
– NO OTHER RELIGION IN BRITIAN DOES THIS – SHOULD PUT YOU ON GUARD.
NO SCHOOL SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DISCRIMINATE AND BE RACIST INCLINED AT
STATE EXPENSE. TO WIT, INDIVIDUALS OF MANY RELIGIONS GO TO STATE
SCHOOLS, BUT ONLY MUSLIMS EVER BECOME RADICALIZED AND NO OTHER. THIS
FACT PROVES BEYOND A DOUBT THAT HOME, MOSQUE, AND FRIENDS TRAINING IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR RADICALIZATION AND NOT STATE SCHOOLS.
FOURTH, HE SAID THE FOLLOWING:
(QUOTE) “Muslim community does not want to integrate with the British
society, indulging in incivility, anti-social behaviour, drug and
knife culture, binge drinking, teenage pregnancies and abortion.”
(QUOTE)
YES, THERE ARE A FEW BAD ELEMENTS WITHIN THE UK COMMUNITY, BUT MOST
ARE GOOD HONEST PEOPLE THAT DO NONE OF THESE NASTY THINGS. BUT MOST
MUSLIM COMMUNITIES ARE FAR WORSE TO THE POINT OF CONSIDERING PEDOPHILE
CHILD MARRIAGES ARE OKAY, HONOR MURDERS, EXTREMISM AND RADICALISM WITH
ONE UK MUSLIM BECOMING A MAJOR BE HEADER FOR ISIS, BOOMING
TRANSPORTATION AND CIVIC CENTERS IN MANY COUNTRIES AND EVEN MURDERING
MANY PEOPLE BY FLYING COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT INTO BUILDINGS, ETC.
DEFINITELY FAR FAR WORSE THAN THE ACTIVITIES OF EVEN THE BAD ONES IN
UK NATIVE SOCIETY.
FIFTH, I AM AN IMMIGRANT MYSELF, BUT AVOIDED BEING BULLIED IN MY HOST
COUNTRY BY INTEGRATING IN AND NOT BEING A RADICAL ISOLATIONIST. I
QUICKLY LEARNED THE LANGUAGE OF MY HOST COUNTRY AND SOUGHT OUT NATIVES
TO BE MY FRIENDS. I AM NOW A WELL THOUGHT OUT LEADER IN MY
NEIGHBORHOOD IN MY HOST COUNTRY, A GENUINE MEMBER OF ITS MULTICULTURAL
SOCIETY, AND THAT IS THE SAME THING MUSLIMS SHOULD DO AS MANY HINDU,
ZOROASTRIAN, SIKH, JEAN, BUDDHIST, IBS, ETC. HAVE DONE.
APPENDIX ON HADITH:
Ha·dith, Hadith, a noun:
1. a collection of traditions containing sayings of the prophet Muhammad that, with accounts of his daily practice (the Sunna), constitute the major source of guidance for Muslims apart from the Koran.
NOW HERE ARE SOME CLEARLY SHOWING THAT MEMBERS OF ISLAM SHOULD DISCRIMINATE AGAINST OTHERS AND EVEN SEEK TO TAX THEM FOR BEING NONE MUSLIM. CLEARLY THEY HAVE NO RESPECT FOR THE FREEDOM OF OTHERS TO BELIEVE DIFFERENTLY, NO MATTER WHAT THEY MAY SAY.
bn Kathir, The Battles of the Prophet, pp. 183-4—Allah, Most High, ordered the believers to prohibit the disbelievers from entering or coming near the sacred Mosque. On that, Quraish thought that this would reduce their profits from trade. Therefore, Allah, Most High, compensated them and ordered them to fight the people of the Book until they embrace Islam or pay the Jizyah. Allah says, “O ye who believe! Truly the pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Therefore, the Messenger of Allah decided to fight the Romans in order to call them to Islam.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir (on Qur’an 9:30)—Fighting the Jews and Christians is legislated because they are idolaters and disbelievers. Allah the Exalted encourages the believers to fight the polytheists, disbelieving Jews and Christians, who uttered this terrible statement and utter lies against Allah, the Exalted. As for the Jews, they claimed that Uzayr was the son of God, Allah is free of what they attribute to Him. As for the misguidance of Christians over Isa, it is obvious.
Sahih Muslim 30—Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”
Sahih Muslim 4366—Muhammad said: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims.”
Sunan An-Nasa’i 3099—The Prophet said: “Whoever dies without having fought or having thought of fighting, he dies on one of the branches of hypocrisy.”
Sunan Ibn Majah 2763—The Messenger of Allah said: “Whoever meets Allah with no mark on him (as a result of fighting) in His cause, he will meet Him with a deficiency.”
Sahih al-Bukhari 6922—Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”
LEARN MORE ABOUT THE BIBLE AND RELIGION – BOTH FALSE AND TRUE – AT WWW.JW.ORG
Muslim Benefit Fraud / Muslims in Europe / Muslims in the UK / UK Muslim Demograhics / UK Statistics
Britain sinking under unproductive Muslims costing £13+ billion a year
[*Note. We encounter endless arguments by salafi libtards claiming there is no verification to these statistics although they are clearly verified under the links in Related]
Modest numerical calculations based on government statistics, wikileaks and media reports reveal that the British government spend a minimum £13+ billion a year from tax revenues on unproductive Muslims. Britain is expected to have more Muslims than all of Kuwait in less than two decades. While the government is trying to create £12 billion in annual cuts by targeting the handicapped, elderly, and poor amongst it’s own citizens, they have ignored a group that is highly overrepresented above anyone else in welfare exploitation. Sweden appears to be gripped in a similar situation with the country drowning in Muslim related expenses.
The Daily Telegraph reported in 2012 that 75% of all Muslim women are unemployed while 50% of all Muslim men are unemployed (67.5% total) – a staggering 350% rise from 13% for men and 18% for women in 2004. Muslims are also on sick leave more than anyone else, with 2001 figures revealing that 24% of females and 21% of males claim disability. Muslims are the most likely among all religious groups to be living in accommodation rented from the council or housing association (28%); 4% live rent-free (2004 figures). As if this is not enough, the total prison population in the UK amongst category A and B criminals (third degree criminals) is now 35-39% Muslim.
Since current statistics fail to clarify how many Muslims actually collect benefits, and whether unemployment figures include those on disability and in prison, only a crude estimate can be made. In spite of this our calculation is based only on basic, lowest payouts in Britain, meaning most additional paypits that Muslims would be entitled to are not included. The indications are nevertheless shocking: roughly 4.25 million Muslims, or more than 85%, live off tax payers (2012 unconfirmed estimate increased the Muslim population number from 3 million to 4.25). If we average this with a simple, quick calculation of the minimum benefit payment of £67 a week granted in Britain for adults, at least £ 284,750,000 per week (£1.139 billion per month) is spent from taxpayers on Muslims who barely contribute anything whatsoever to Britain’s revenues – except making more Muslims.
The calculation is not detailed enough to include housing benefits, childcare support, medical care and other coverage. We can estimate that only in unemployment support, Muslims cost the British government at least £ 13+ billion a year.
If the same population growth continues in a steady flow, by 2030 Britain will have a 40% Muslim population. And who will feed and house them? With this type of parasitic addition to society there is simply nowhere for the British economy to go but downhills. As if that is not bad enough, 32 percent of Muslim students (born in the UK) believe killing in the name of religion is justified; 54 percent wanted a Muslim Party to represent their world view in Parliament, and 40 percent of young Muslims in the UK want the country to be governed under Sharia law (2004 report).
Related:
1. Muslim statistics
2. Wikileaks: UK Muslim demographics 2009
3. Worldwide Muslim demographics and social conditions with the expansion of Islam
4. UK Muslim prison population: Prison pressure to convert to Islam
5. Wikipedia: Islam in the UK
6. Pew Global Statistics: Muslims in Europe
7. Dhimmi Guardian: Why Muslim women are unemployed (2009 data)
8. British Muslim Statistics (from 2001 census)
9. WikiIslam Muslim Statistics
10. Daily Telegraph: “…50% of Muslim men & 75% of Muslim women are unemployed“. Britain’s coping classes at breaking point
11. Almost a quarter of state school pupils are from an ethnic minority
12. National Statesman: The lost Muslim generation
13. Fox News: “…90% unemployment amongst Muslims in Sweden”. Sweden’s Muslim immigration problem
14. Number of British Muslims will double to 5.5m in 20 years [they are already reaching this 20 year projection]
Europe and Britain sinking under weight of welfare costs
It’s not just that much welfare spending has become bloated, unfair and sometimes outright corrupt, it is also that it is no longer economically affordable.
By Jeremy Warner10:47PM BST 08 Oct 2012 | The Telegraph
So how did Mr Nasty – aka George Osborne – do? I give the Chancellor a qualified thumbs-up for his party conference speech, even if the word “growth” was almost as absent from his rhetoric as “deficit” was last week from Ed Milliband. Osborne is as unforthcoming on how to get the economy growing again as the Labour leader is on dealing with our debts.
We can quickly dispense with the “shares for employment rights” initiative – this was just an irrelevant gimmick which will struggle to gain traction even in start-up companies.
But in choosing to focus so strongly on the need for welfare reform, the Chancellor put his finger on the nub of the problem, not just for Britain, but for virtually all advanced economies.
It’s not just that much welfare spending has become bloated, unfair and sometimes outright corrupt, it is also that it is no longer economically affordable. Osborne couched his case in highly political terms, as you might expect after the latest British Social Attitudes survey.
This showed a high degree of public support for further cuts in welfare spending. Where once the Tories were regarded as cruel and heartless for wanting to slash benefits, it now seems that they can’t be tough enough. Politically, Osborne is therefore pushing at an open door when he says this is not just about saving money – it’s about fairness and enterprise.
How can we justify the incomes of those out of work rising faster than the incomes of those in work, he asks, or giving flats to young people who have never worked when working people twice their age still have to live with their parents because they cannot afford a separate home?
More emotively still, he asked how it was possible to justify a system where people in work have to consider the costs of having another child, while those who are out of work don’t. By raising these questions, Osborne gives voice to a strongly populist message, but he also speaks to an underlying, economic imperative – advanced economies are long past the stage of being able to afford such largesse.
In his speech, Osborne was aiming only at the easy political targets of entitlement spending – for want of a better term, the “social scroungers”, or those who choose welfare over work. The savings that can be made here are certainly not to be sneezed at. Looking at those areas of welfare spending which grew most strongly under the last government, they were things like housing benefit and other forms of income support.
Yet they are dwarfed by healthcare and pensions spending, and it is these entitlements which pose the biggest challenge for the future.
As it happens, Britain is rather better placed than many of its European peers in this regard. On pensions spending, the age of entitlement is already being raised, and will in future continue to rise in line with life expectancy. The per capita cost of the pensions promise is thereby capped.
The same is not true of health and long-term care, the costs of which will grow rapidly as society ages. Relatively favourable demographics make these costs less of a problem for Britain than they are for much of the rest of Europe.
Recent projections aired by Fabio Pammolli, professor of economics at the IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, show quite shocking levels of exposure. If there wasn’t already enough to worry about in Europe’s fiscal meltdown, these forecasts point to destruction of the very foundations of the European social market economy. Taking into account the expected decrease in fertility and mortality rates, the burden on active workers of healthcare and pensions spending is expected to grow over the next 20 years to 63.5pc of GDP per capita in Italy, 61.6pc in France, and 53.3pc in Germany.
Favourable demographics mean that by comparison, the projected UK burden is relatively small at just 38.7pc. Yet it is still quite high enough.
In Europe, stopping is going to make the present outbreak of economic, social and political instability over deficit reduction look like a stroll in the park. We are only in the very early stages of Europe’s wider fiscal crisis. There is still much worse to come, regardless of whether the euro survives or not.
It might be said in defence of the single currency that it has at least forced countries to make a start on the sort of structural reform that one way or another is bound to come.
Well possibly, but you see very little evidence of such reforms in France – on the contrary, France seems to be haring off in the other direction as fast as it possibly can – and ultimately, it will be the euro that gets the blame for the stultifying effect the present policy mix of fiscal and monetary austerity is having on growth. Eventually, it will break under the pressure.
In its latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF concedes that one of the reasons it has been over-estimating growth prospects for Europe is that short-term fiscal multipliers have been bigger than expected. This is just a complicated way of saying that when everyone is cutting all at the same time, the effect is almost bound to be self-defeating. Lack of growth will cause deficits to increase regardless.
It is hard to find a single chief executive who is interested in serious investment on mainland Europe right now. For all the reasons highlighted, the place is regarded as too toxic to touch. The future of the euro is just one among a mountain of negatives.
All of which means that Osborne can expect little or no help from the Continent in his efforts to get on top of Britain’s own debts. Europe is set on a five to 10-year period of nil growth, falling living standards and brutally disappointed expectations. All that Europeans can look forward to once the present phase of austerity comes to an end is yet more austerity.
Is there anything the Chancellor can do to help himself? Belatedly, he seems now at least to be attacking the right targets. I’ve been a supporter of the broad outline of the Government’s deficit reduction strategy, but there is no doubt that front-end loading the consolidation with tax increases and swingeing cuts in capital spending has damaged growth badly and therefore steepened the climb back to health.
The Coalition went for the easy hits, rather than the really difficult, long-term stuff. This has not served either the Government or the economy well.
Osborne rejected the case for tax cuts yesterday, but actually, putting money back in people’s pockets is the best thing he could do to support demand and give the British economy a fighting chance against the winds blowing in from Europe.
To be effective, such tax cuts cannot be temporary, but must be permanent, and therefore funded with far more draconian action on welfare than we have seen to date. Cameron and Osborne need to ask themselves just three questions. What are they in government for? Is it compromise and defeat? Or reform, growth and a sustainable future? ?[SOURCE - RETRIVED FROM https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/.../britain-sinking.../ ON 4/ 6/2018]
Edit or delete this
Britain sinking under unproductive Muslims costing £13+ billion a year
THEMUSLIMISSUE.WORDPRESS.COM
Britain sinking under unproductive Muslims costing £13+ billion a year
COMBINATION OF [1] THE SCRIPTURE OF THE DAY AND [1] DISCOURSE ON FUNDAMENTALISM. With the Scripture of the Day first.
[1] SCRIPTURE OF THE DAY [114B]
Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them; and them which suffer adversity, as being yourselves also in the body. Hebrews 13:5, [authorized King James Bible; AV]
The Apostle Paul was speaking here of brothers who had been imprisoned for their faith like himself. At Philippians 1:12 – 14, [AV] “But I would ye should understand, brethren, that the things which happened unto me have fallen out rather unto the furtherance of the gospel; 13 So that my bonds in Christ are manifest in all the palace, and in all other places; 14 And many of the brethren in the Lord, waxing confident by my bonds, are much more bold to speak the word without fear.” The Apostle Paul made clear how we should show brotherly love to those unjustly being punished at Hebrews 10:34 – 39, [AV] “For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance. 35 Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompence of reward. 36 For ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise. 37 For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry. 38 Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him. 39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.” We should make fervent prayer for such ones as shown by Hebrews 13:18 – 19, [AV] “Pray for us: for we trust we have a good conscience, in all things willing to live honestly. 19 But I beseech you the rather to do this, that I may be restored to you the sooner.”
[2] DISCOURSE ON FUNDAMENTALISM:
Fundamentalism is not limited to misguided so called Christian groups that run about asking have you been born again and/or have you been saved. These groups clearly do not recognize the Bible as the Standard as the Bible clearly says at Matthew 10:22, "And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved." (American Standard Version; ASV); and this is affirmed at Matthew 24:13, "But he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved." (ASV). And clearly these so called Christian fundamentalist overlook Mark 13:13, "And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved." (ASV).
They miss the mark in that they believe once saved always saved which is clearly not the case as was testified to at Luke 8:12, "And those by the way side are they that have heard; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word from their heart, that they may not believe and be saved." (ASV); therefore, it is easy to see as Matthew 10:22, Matthew 24:13, and Mark 13:13 all testify to the fact that only he who endures to the end will be saved as clearly shown in the ultimate standard, the Bible which is the word of God (YHWH).
the Bible, it is a unique standard set by the highest sovereign power in the universe. God (YHWH) as a rule or measure by which all things are to be judged. Since he created all things, it is his absolute right to set the standard as he is responsible for the existence of all things in the universe.
Now let's look at fundamentalist in a none-Christian setting. This by I Won, "--"I've even met Buddhists who were fundamentalists, which struck me as odd at first. But fundamentalism is an emotional disease, and that disease can affect anyone, even if their arguments are correct. The tendency in group schisms is to project all evil onto
the other group, and pagans or atheists who could easily spot the irrational component of a Christian fundamentalist's argument may have blind spots of their own. The Christian's fundamentalism transfers like a virus to the nonchristian, even as the beliefs themselves are regarded as fairy tales. If the same anger can be held by people with very different
beliefs, it's the anger itself that is the problem, not necessarily the beliefs. This is another reason why it's so hard to win religious debates. You have to win them nonverbally, rather than assuming logic alone will have an impact. Fundamentalists are so good at
bringing up frustration and anger in others that they can then use that anger as a sign that "atheists aren't happy" or "pagans are hostile people". Once you've fallen into that trap, the fundamentalist has won." [source - comments by I Won].
Likewise the Muslims also have their misguided fundamentalist, but there is no need to discuss those as all know of how misguided and unloving they are. The name Osama bin Ladin in fact tells the entire store of these evil misguided ones as all have read of what he was behind on 9/11 in New York.
Fundamentalism and radicalism is to be avoided as they are always in the wrong and hateful of others; whereas, the Bible clearly shows at 1 John 4:8, "He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love." (ASV). However, the fundamentalist do not preach love nor the true word of God (YHWH) clearly showing they are not of God (YHWH). This fact is amplified at 1 John 4:10, "Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son [to be] the propitiation for our sins." (ASV); and at 1 John 4:12, "No man hath beheld God at any time: if we love one another, God abideth in us, and his love is perfected in us:" (ASV); and at 1 John 4:16, "And we know and have believed the love which God hath in us. God is love; and he that abideth in love abideth in God, and God abideth in him." (ASV); and at 1 John 4:20, "If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, cannot love God whom he hath not seen." (ASV); and at 1 John 5:3, "For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous" (ASV). Notice, the last quoted scripture emphasis the need to keep his commandments if we love him and we can only know an do this if we accept the Bible as the Standard as it is his written word for our guidance.
LEARN MORE ABOUT THE BIBLE AND RELIGION - BOTH TRUE AND FALSE - AT WWW.JW.ORG
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
